Submissions

Author Guidelines

For Submission

Manuscripts should be submitted through the journal’s online submission and tracking platform, which enables an efficient and economical review process. Authors are requested to upload the complete manuscript in an editable format such as MS Word (.doc/.docx) or LaTeX, following the detailed instructions provided in the Author Guidelines and using the journal’s Online Submission System. Adhering to these guidelines helps avoid unnecessary delays and supports a faster peer-review and publication timeline.

There is no strict page limit; however, most accepted articles generally range between 12–30 pages. While preparing a manuscript for publication in Dynamic Wellbeing Economics , authors are strongly encouraged to focus on methodological clarity, the significance of findings, and linguistic precision.

Prior to submission, contributors should carefully review their files to ensure that special symbols, formulas, tables, charts, and illustrations display correctly. All figures, tables, diagrams, or appendices must be cited in the main text at appropriate points and accompanied by clear titles or explanatory captions.

Originality

Submissions must represent original, unpublished work that is not under consideration elsewhere. Innovative thinking, novel methodologies, and cross-disciplinary perspectives are highly valued. Manuscripts that are merely translated versions of previously published studies will not be considered for publication in Dynamic Wellbeing Economics.

Language

Only manuscripts written in English will be reviewed for publication in Dynamic Wellbeing Economics . Authors whose first language is not English are encouraged to seek professional language editing before final submission. The journal may also recommend independent editing services if needed.

Manuscript Writing Style

For general formatting and structure, authors should follow the guidance given below which is intended to support authors in preparing a clear and consistent manuscript.

General Writing Principles

Basics

• Avoid excessive use of the first person unless presenting a justified argument.
• Prefer the active voice for clearer sentence construction.
• Write out commonly used terms instead of abbreviations in the main text (e.g., percentage instead of “%,” analysis of variance instead of “ANOVA”), though abbreviations may be used in tables or figures.
• Maintain consistent verb tense within each section.

Avoiding Plagiarism

Whenever authors draw upon data, concepts, or wording from another source—whether published or unpublished—they must provide proper citation. This applies to both direct quotations and paraphrased content.

All submissions to Dynamic Wellbeing Economics undergo an initial similarity screening using plagiarism-detection software that compares the manuscript with extensive academic databases and online sources. A similarity report is generated to identify overlapping content.

Clarity

Authors should employ formal academic language and avoid informal expressions, exaggerations, or colloquialisms. Attention should be given to grammar, spelling accuracy, punctuation, sentence length, and logical flow to ensure readability and coherence.

Bias and Inclusive Language

Gender

Use gender-neutral terminology unless gender distinctions are essential to the analysis.

• Prefer “individuals,” “people,” or “participants” instead of gender-specific terms.
• Where appropriate, plural constructions such as “they” may be used to avoid gender bias.
• Example: instead of “Each student must submit his paper,” write “Students must submit their papers.”

Race and Ethnicity

Avoid stereotypes and use precise, respectful terminology when describing demographic groups.

• Be specific when relevant (e.g., Japanese rather than Asian if accuracy is required).
• Acceptable terms include: African American, Black, White, Hispanic, Latino/Latina, Native American, Asian American.
• Avoid outdated or offensive terminology.

Abbreviations and Acronyms

When introducing an abbreviation for the first time, provide the full term followed by the abbreviation in parentheses. Thereafter, the abbreviation alone may be used.

Example: “World Health Organization (WHO)” → later “WHO.”

Verb Tense Usage

Literature Review:

Use the past tense when referring to completed studies.

Example: “Smith (2020) reported a significant correlation…”

Methods Section:

Describe procedures in the past tense.

Example: “The survey included 150 participants.”

Results Section:

Use either past or present tense, but remain consistent within the section.

Example: “The findings indicate…” or “The findings indicated…”

Punctuation and Formatting

• Use one space after punctuation marks, not two.
• Ensure punctuation style matches the surrounding font style (including italics).
• When listing numbered items in the text, use (1), (2), (3) rather than “1.” or “1)”.

Example: “The analysis identified three key variables: (1) socioeconomic status, (2) educational level, and (3) access to healthcare.”

Figures / Tables / Illustrations (if any):

The authors are expected to submit good-quality figure(s) in PDF, PPT, MS Word, TIFF, or JPEG versions.

Requirement

• Width = 8.5 inches (In-between the required size)
• Height = 11 inches (In-between the required size)

All figures should be in vector scale (except half tone, photograph.)

Tables:

Data Tables should be submitted in Microsoft Word or Excel format.

• Each table should include a title/caption explaining the details discussed in the table. Detailed legends may then follow.
• Table number in bold font, i.e., Table 1, should follow a title. The title should be in small case with the first letter in caps.
• Columns and rows of data should be made visibly distinct by ensuring that the borders of each cell are performed as black lines.
• Tables should be numbered in Arabic numerals sequentially in order of their citation in the body of the text.
• Reference cited in both the table and text, please insert a lettered footnote to refer to the numbered reference in the text.
• It is adequate to present data in Tables to avoid unnecessary repetition and reduce the length of the text.
• The author must ensure the citation of each table in the text.
• The author should explain symbols and non-standard abbreviations at the end of the text.

Copyright:

Submission of a manuscript to Dynamic Wellbeing Economics implies that all authors have read and agreed to the content of the Covering Letter, and the Terms and Conditions of granting the copyright to Dynamic Wellbeing Economics. Thereby, the authors agree that the manuscripts submitted to the journal have not been published earlier, or are simultaneously submitted for publishing elsewhere.

Dynamic Wellbeing Economics grants the Author(s) a continuing global license, without fees or exclusivity, for non-commercial use and dissemination of the published Article. This means:

• All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode), which permits free distribution and reproduction in any medium that the work is properly cited.
• The authors retain the copyright of their published Open Access article. They will also have the right to:

           -     Reproduce the article, to incorporate the article into one or more collective works, and to reproduce the article as incorporated in collective works;

           -     Create and reproduce Derivative Works for educational purposes.

- Distribute Copies

• Right for any commercial application of the work, with prior agreement by the author, is exclusively granted to Dynamic Wellbeing Economics.

Author Guidelines:

All submissions to Dynamic Wellbeing Economics should be accompanied by a title page.

Title Page

The title page should combine article’s title, author(s) full name and affiliation, corresponding author(s)’ name, institutional affiliation/address, and e-mail.

Authors should also present a short 'running title'. The title, running title, and keywords (as shown in the original manuscript) should be rewritten in the title page.

Manuscript Preparation

Manuscripts aimed to be submitted in Dynamic Wellbeing Economics should have following sections:

• Title
• Abstract
• Keywords
• Main Text
• Conclusion
• List of Abbreviations (if any)
• Approval for Publication/ethics approval/consent to publish (if applied)
• Availability of Data and Materials
• Funding statement
• Conflict of Interest
• Acknowledgments
• References
• Appendices
• Figures/Illustrations (if any)
• Tables (if any)
• Supportive/Supplementary Material (if any)

Guidelines:

Title

Select a heading that is clear, focused, and informative, preferably no longer than 15 words. Authors are encouraged to indicate the nature of the study in the title when appropriate (for example, systematic review, case study, or meta-analysis).

Abstract

Provide a brief yet comprehensive overview of the paper in no more than 250 words. The abstract should be written as a single paragraph without internal headings and must summarize the objective, approach, principal findings, and key conclusion of the study.

Keywords

Include six to eight significant keywords that accurately reflect the subject matter of the manuscript. Choose terms that researchers are likely to search for in academic databases. Keywords may repeat important concepts from the title and should naturally appear within the abstract and main text.

Main Body of the Manuscript

The primary content follows the keywords and may be divided based on the article type.

Original Research Articles: typically include Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion, followed by sections such as Abbreviations (if applicable), Conflict of Interest, Acknowledgements, and References.

Review Articles: should contain an introductory background, a well-structured discussion, and a closing summary. Authors should begin with a broad overview of the field, acknowledge major prior reviews, and then highlight recent advances rather than repeating earlier summaries.

Foreign expressions or non-English scholarly terms (e.g., a priori, in vivo) should be italicized. Abbreviations must be written in full when first introduced, except for universally recognized measurement units. Carefully verify the accuracy of Greek letters, formulas, and special characters during submission and again at the proof stage to prevent formatting errors.

Introduction

This section should clearly outline the context of the research, existing knowledge, and the objectives or research questions being addressed.

Materials and Methods

Describe the research design, procedures, tools, and data sources in sufficient detail to enable replication. If previously published techniques are adapted, acknowledge the original source and explain any modifications. Ethical approval or review board clearance, where applicable, may be mentioned here or in a separate ethics statement at the end of the manuscript.

Results

Present the primary outcomes in a logical order. Tables, figures, and illustrations should be numbered sequentially and referenced within the text. Avoid repeating numerical data already shown in visuals. Both supportive and non-supportive findings should be reported transparently.

Discussion

Interpret the results in relation to existing literature, emphasizing their significance and implications. Comparisons with earlier studies are encouraged, but excessive literature repetition should be avoided. Authors may combine the Results and Discussion sections if it improves clarity.

Conclusion

End with a concise paragraph summarizing the study’s contributions and outcomes. Brief suggestions for future research directions are welcome.

Funding Information

If financial support was received, clearly state the funding source and grant or award number. Indicate whether the sponsor had any involvement in study design, manuscript preparation, or publication decisions.

If no external funding was obtained, authors may state that the research was conducted without specific financial support.

Abbreviations List

Although abbreviations should be defined at first mention, authors may also include a compiled list after the main text for reader convenience.

Appendices

Extended methodological details or supplementary explanations may be placed in appendices. Label them sequentially (e.g., Appendix A, Appendix B).

Supplementary Files

Additional datasets, multimedia files, or extended materials intended for publication should be uploaded separately from the main manuscript. These items must be cited in the text and listed under a dedicated “Supplementary Material” heading before the references.

Conflict of Interest

Disclose any financial or personal relationships that could influence the work. If none exist, include a clear statement confirming the absence of conflicts.

Acknowledgements

Recognize individuals or institutions that contributed intellectually or technically to the project but do not meet authorship criteria. Honorary or courtesy authorship based solely on position or title is discouraged.

Consent for Publication

When a manuscript includes identifiable personal information, images, or recordings, authors must confirm that informed consent has been obtained. For minors, consent must be secured from a parent or legal guardian.

References Section

Place all cited works at the end of the manuscript under the heading REFERENCES (formatted as a primary-level heading). Entries must be double-spaced and displayed with a hanging indent.

Use Title Case for all publication titles—capitalize major words while leaving short prepositions (e.g., in, on, under), articles (a, an, the), and coordinating conjunctions (and, but, or) in lowercase unless they begin a title or subtitle.

For hyphenated terms, capitalize only the first word unless the second element is a proper noun or adjective.

Example: Decision-making in Early Childhood (not Decision-Making unless the second word is a proper noun, e.g., Euro-American Relations).

Arrange all entries alphabetically by the surname of the first author. Provide authors’ full first names wherever available; however, if the original publication uses initials, retain them. List every author’s name—avoid using et al. in the reference list unless the author is a formal committee or organization.

If the same author appears repeatedly, write the full name in each entry and order the works chronologically from oldest to newest.

Illustration (single author, different years):

Morgan, Daniel. 2001. Urban Communities and Social Change. London: Harper Press.

Morgan, Daniel. 2009. Cities in Transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Morgan, Daniel. 2018. “Revisiting Community Networks.” Journal of Urban Studies 44:210–225.

When an author has both solo publications and co-authored works, list all single-author items first—even if dates overlap.

Multiple Authors with Same First Author

When several references share the same leading author, sort them alphabetically according to the second author’s surname.

Example:

Bennett, Laura and Michael Cruz. 2012. “Media Literacy in Schools.” Education Today 18(3):45–52.

Bennett, Laura, Steven Holt, and Rebecca King. 2010. “Digital Skills among Youth.” Learning Quarterly 22(1):10–28.

If an author (or identical author group) has more than one publication in the same year, distinguish them by adding letters after the year (2021a, 2021b, etc.), then arrange alphabetically by title.

Example:

Patel, Rina. 2021a. “Community Health Initiatives in Rural Areas.” Public Health Review 9(2):100–118.

Patel, Rina. 2021b. “Nutrition Awareness Campaigns.” Health Policy Journal 14(1):55–70.

Reference Formats and Samples

Book – Single Author

Format:

Surname, First Name. Year. Book Title in Title Case and Italics. City: Publisher.

Example:

Lopez, Maria. 2015. Cultural Identity in Modern Europe. Madrid: Iberia Press.

Book – Two or More Authors

Invert only the first author’s name. Separate authors with commas and place “and” before the final name.

Example:

Nguyen, Thomas, and Olivia Brown. 2019. Foundations of Environmental Policy. Seattle, WA: GreenLeaf Publications.

Edited Book (Entire Volume)

Add “ed.” or “eds.” after the editor name(s).

Example:

Khan, Aisha and Robert Mills, eds. 2017. Global Perspectives on Migration. Toronto: Maple House.

Chapter in an Edited Book

Place the chapter title in quotation marks, followed by page numbers and editor details.

Example:

Reed, Jonathan. 2010. “Youth Participation in Civic Life.” Pp. 88–110 in Democracy in Action, edited by L. Carter and P. Singh. New Delhi: Horizon Books.

Scholarly Journal Article

Format:

Surname, First Name. Year. “Article Title.” Journal Title Volume(Issue):Page Range.

Example:

Harris, Emily. 2020. “Technology Adoption in Higher Education.” International Journal of Learning 12(4):233–247.

Magazine or Newspaper Article

Example:

Turner, James. 2018. “The Future of Renewable Energy.” Global Times, July 14, pp. 22–24.

Newspaper (No Author):

The Daily Herald. 2021. Editorial. March 3, p. B-2.

Public or Government Documents

Provide enough identifying information for retrieval.

Examples:

Ministry of Education. 2016. National Literacy Report. London: Government Press.

Environmental Protection Act, Section 12 (2014).

Legal Cases and Legislation

Italicize court case names; legislative acts remain in regular type.

Examples:

Smith v. State, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).

Education Reform Act of 2005, Public Law 108-21 (2005).

Unpublished or Forthcoming Work

Example:

Adams, Peter. Forthcoming. “Urban Agriculture Trends.” Journal of Environmental Planning.

Dissertation or Thesis

Example:

Chen, Li. 2014. “Digital Communication Patterns among Teenagers.” PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Melbourne.

Book Accessed Online

Include retrieval date and full link.

Example:

Roberts, Helen. 2012. Modern Marketing Strategies. Boston: Beacon Press. Retrieved May 10, 2022 (complete URL).

Archival Material

Example:

National Archives, File 7, April 12, 1968. Memorandum on Education Policy Reform.

Electronic Sources

Follow the same structure as print sources, adding date accessed and URL. For journals published exclusively online, simply include the viewing date and web address after the citation.

Article Processing Charges (APC):

The Article Processing Charge (APC) for articles that are accepted for publication in Dynamic Wellbeing Economics is GBP 300 (this does not include extra GBP 30 for bank charges).

Privacy Statement:

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Publication Ethics and Misconduct Guidelines:

Responsibilities of Editors

Publication Decisions

The Editor holds ultimate responsibility for determining which submitted manuscripts are suitable for publication. Such decisions should be guided by the journal’s scope, editorial policies, and applicable legal considerations, including matters of defamation, intellectual property rights, and plagiarism. Editors may seek input from associate editors or external reviewers before reaching a final verdict.

Impartial Evaluation

Submissions must be judged exclusively on academic quality, originality, and relevance. Personal attributes of the authors—such as nationality, gender, ethnicity, religious affiliation, or political views—must not influence editorial decisions.

Confidential Handling

Editors and editorial team members are obligated to treat all submitted manuscripts as confidential documents. Information about a submission may only be shared with individuals directly involved in the review and publication workflow, such as reviewers, editorial advisors, or the publisher.

Conflicts of Interest and Use of Unpublished Material

Any unpublished content encountered during the editorial process must not be utilized for personal research or benefit without explicit written authorization from the author. Editors must also disclose any potential conflicts that could affect their neutrality.

Responsibilities of Reviewers

Role in Peer Review

Reviewers contribute specialized knowledge that assists editors in evaluating the scholarly merit, accuracy, and relevance of submissions. Their assessments help shape editorial judgments and provide constructive feedback to authors.

Timeliness

If a reviewer feels inadequately qualified to assess a manuscript or cannot complete the review within the requested timeframe, they should promptly inform the editorial office and decline the invitation.

Confidentiality

All manuscripts under review are confidential and must not be shared, discussed, or used for personal advantage. Insights or data obtained through the review process are strictly privileged.

Objectivity and Professional Conduct

Reviews should be fair, balanced, and evidence-based. Personal criticism or derogatory remarks toward authors are inappropriate. Feedback must be articulated clearly and supported with logical reasoning.

Recognition of Sources

Reviewers should highlight any relevant literature the author may have overlooked and inform the editor of significant similarities between the submitted work and existing publications.

Conflicts of Interest

Reviewers must refrain from evaluating manuscripts where personal, professional, or financial relationships with the authors or affiliated institutions could compromise impartiality.

Responsibilities of Authors

Accuracy and Integrity in Reporting

Authors must present research findings truthfully and comprehensively, ensuring that data, analysis, and interpretations are accurate and transparent. Sufficient methodological detail should be included so that others may replicate the study if necessary. Fabrication, falsification, or intentional misrepresentation is strictly unethical.

Data Availability and Retention

Where feasible, authors should be prepared to provide original datasets for editorial inspection and retain supporting data for a reasonable period after publication.

Original Work and Proper Citation

Submissions must consist of original material. Any borrowed ideas, quotations, or data must be appropriately acknowledged through accurate citation.

Duplicate or Concurrent Submission

Submitting identical or substantially similar manuscripts to multiple journals at the same time is considered unethical and is prohibited.

Credit and Acknowledgment

All sources that significantly influenced the research should be properly cited. Contributions that do not meet authorship criteria should be recognized in an acknowledgment section.

Authorship Criteria

Only individuals who have made meaningful intellectual contributions—such as conceptualization, methodology design, execution, or interpretation—should be listed as authors. Others who assisted in limited capacities should be credited separately.

Role of the Corresponding Author

The designated corresponding author serves as the primary liaison with the journal. This individual must confirm that all listed co-authors approve the manuscript’s content, consent to submission, and that no deserving contributor has been omitted.

Funding Transparency

All financial support or sponsorship related to the research must be clearly disclosed within the manuscript.

Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest

Authors are required to reveal any financial, institutional, or personal relationships that could potentially influence the study’s findings or interpretation.

Corrections of Published Errors

If a significant mistake or inaccuracy is identified after publication, the author is responsible for promptly notifying the journal and cooperating in issuing corrections, retractions, or amendments as appropriate.